My rating: 2 of 5 stars
This book is described as a paranormal thriller in the blurb so I thought I knew what to expect. However, my main problem when reading The Station was there was not enough initial incredulity expressed by the various characters. When a voice speaks to Eric, the main protagonist, from a radio and even responds when he speaks back, is not something that most “normal” people take in their stride. But after a slight doubt he seems to. OK, it’s a paranormal tale so the reader is going to allow a bit of room for vivid imagination for the tale to unwind. When ghosts appeared to other people and still others just seem to accept the spooky radio, without a shocked comment or suggesting someone might need sectioning by a psychiatrist, then I started to lose interest. The book still needs a lot of work in my opinion to make it more credible and to feel completed. The general idea and the various twists and turns of the story have a lot to commend it to keen readers of this genre and, although it may not be as horrific as the new movie Paranormal Activity, it seems to be in that vein.
I was also left with certain practical questions about too many things that the author seemed to gloss over. What happened to Eleanor, Eric’s apparently abandoned but affectionate cat? Can a shotgun produce a single wound in someone’s leg when it’s a scattergun? Would a broadband link to the internet be possible in a remote cabin, somewhere in “the heart of Nawayee Forest” Minnesota? It was pretty obvious about half way through the book that a shocking family revelation would appear towards the end and, unfortunately, it did!
After a rather slow beginning and build up to the story I found that I was being too distracted by the many punctuation, grammatical and typo errors throughout the story to be absorbed by the plot. Some examples: “the (United) states” should be capitalized; adjectives were being used as adverbs as in “bad off” rather than the correct “badly off”; “He let me borrow” had the word “it” missing when Eric was returning a borrowed umbrella; the word “bequest” was used when the context required “request”; and the lack of the formal comma whenever another character was being addressed in some way: as in “Thank you (,) Pam” or “Hi (,) honey”. This kind of dialogue omission became very noticeable after a while. There were quite a few typos that could easily have been spotted with a second glance at the text, such as using the word “closet” when it meant “closed” – produced quite a different meaning! I received a copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.
View all my reviews